• Space/Science
  • GeekSpeak
  • Mysteries of
    the Multiverse
  • Science Fiction
  • The Comestible Zone
  • Off-Topic
  • Community
  • Flame
  • CurrentEvents

Recent posts

Federal judge reopens Trump’s IRS case and demands to know if her court was defrauded. BuckGalaxy May 29, 2026 10:38 pm (Flame)

Ukraine winning the war BuckGalaxy May 29, 2026 11:14 am (CurrentEvents)

New Glenn explodes in big setback for Blue Origin BuckGalaxy May 28, 2026 7:54 pm (Space/Science)

Firefly set to visit Gruithuisen Domes BuckGalaxy May 28, 2026 4:32 pm (Space/Science)

Trump threatens another ally BuckGalaxy May 27, 2026 5:56 pm (CurrentEvents)

NASA Scientists Discover Material That Could Protect Jet Engines And Moon Equipment BuckGalaxy May 25, 2026 12:36 pm (Space/Science)

SEASON 5 - FOR ALL MANKIND BuckGalaxy May 24, 2026 11:28 pm (Science Fiction)

Trump's impulsive, ill-advised war has screwed the world BuckGalaxy May 19, 2026 1:46 pm (CurrentEvents)

Blue Origin's Blue Ring Asteroid Prospectors BuckGalaxy May 19, 2026 12:19 pm (Space/Science)

Europe unveils the RLV C5, a partially reusable rocket designed to rival SpaceX Starship BuckGalaxy May 19, 2026 2:06 am (Space/Science)

Dividing up the World RobVG May 15, 2026 12:56 pm (CurrentEvents)

Foundation RobVG May 15, 2026 11:56 am (Science Fiction)

Home » Off-Topic

TOTALLY, absolutely off-topic June 21, 2020 10:49 am hank

I just watched a modern production of the old Broadway show “42nd Street”. It brought up a question that I have asked myself many times before…

Why do girl’s legs look better today than they did in the 1930s and 40s?

I’ve seen a million of those old “show” movies from the Busby Berkely era, and I’m sure that in those days (just as today) the dancers were all chosen from the top ranks of their profession. They were just as skilled and athletic, as well-trained, as performers are today. But today’s girl’s seem more physically attractive, their legs seem longer and more perfectly formed–bluntly, sexier, than the hoofers playing the same parts in the old movies. In fact, many of the old-time sex bombshells from Hollywood just don’t seem to have as good a figure as even the typical modern B-level starlet.

I’ve noticed the same thing in athletes (figure skaters, gymnasts, swimmers, etc), but the sample size is much smaller so it is hard to say I’m seeing a trend, or if I’m just making it all up.

Could this be function of modern diet, training methods, or a tendency to cast different body types? Or perhaps its a slowly evolving standard or expectation of feminine beauty. I’m sure a similar effect would be noticeable among male performers, but its harder to pick up on because they wear more clothes. And maybe I’m not paying as much attention.

This is not a frivolous question. I’ve been a fan of old movies for a long time, and I’ve noticed this effect for years. I also realize that physical attractiveness is completely subjective and driven by cultural norms and fashion as well as biological health or apparent reproductive fitness. We all recognize that different cultures and different eras of our own culture have had different and changing standards of “beauty”. Look at the paintings of the old masters, fat girls and pale skins used to be in, tanned and skinny are the rage today. I’ve also noticed changes in what is considered “attractive” even in my own lifetime. Is it perception or population that is changing?

I’m interested in your comments.

  • I blame the liberals... by RL 2020-06-21 11:49:22
    • It was one of the lesser-known successes of the New Deal. by hank 2020-06-21 12:37:02

    Search

    The Control Panel

    • Log in
    • Register