• Space/Science
  • GeekSpeak
  • Mysteries of
    the Multiverse
  • Science Fiction
  • The Comestible Zone
  • Off-Topic
  • Community
  • Flame
  • CurrentEvents

Recent posts

Day 346 ER December 14, 2025 10:53 am (Space/Science)

In the eye of the beast ER December 14, 2025 7:40 am (Space/Science)

My New Year's Dissolution ER December 12, 2025 7:22 pm (CurrentEvents)

Theories about 16 Psyche BuckGalaxy December 12, 2025 12:34 am (Space/Science)

Mike Lindell, MyPillow Founder, Announces Run for Minnesota Governor BuckGalaxy December 11, 2025 10:30 pm (CurrentEvents)

Trouble in Paradise BuckGalaxy December 10, 2025 8:09 pm (CurrentEvents)

The Prisoner Survives BuckGalaxy December 9, 2025 9:16 pm (Off-Topic)

La Doctrina Monroe ER December 9, 2025 9:56 am (CurrentEvents)

Its a beautiful day in the neighborhood.... ER December 8, 2025 7:04 pm (Space/Science)

Alien Physiology and the Meaning of Life BuckGalaxy December 8, 2025 5:37 pm (Off-Topic)

Home » CurrentEvents

If Scientific fact contradicts the Republican talking points, they will silence science. June 16, 2019 9:44 am RL

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/trump-s-order-slash-number-science-advisory-boards-blasted-critics-n1017921

Trump’s order to slash number of science advisory boards blasted by critics as ‘nonsensical’

President Donald Trump signed an executive order late Friday to cut the number of government advisory committees by a third across all federal agencies, a move that the White House said is long overdue and necessary to ensure good stewardship of taxpayers’ money.

But critics said it is the Trump administration’s latest effort to undermine science-based and fact-supported decision-making.

“This is another example of how disconnected the Trump administration is from the needs of the American people and how to protect them from harm,” said Mustafa Ali, who resigned in 2017 as the senior adviser for environmental justice at the Environmental Protection Agency.

Experts on the advisory committees, which were formalized under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) in 1972, give the executive branch input on issues ranging from high-level nuclear waste disposal, the depletion of atmospheric ozone, AIDS, drug addiction, school improvement and housing.

The administration has for two years been “shrinking and restricting the role of federal science advisory committees,” said Gretchen Goldman, the research director with the Center for Science and Democracy at the Union of Concerned Scientists, in a statement. “Now they’re removing the possibility of even making decisions based on robust science advice. It’s no longer death by a thousand cuts. It’s taking a knife to the jugular.”

  • Prestige and Respect by ER 2019-06-16 12:53:25

    Search

    The Control Panel

    • Log in
    • Register