• Space/Science
  • GeekSpeak
  • Mysteries of
    the Multiverse
  • Science Fiction
  • The Comestible Zone
  • Off-Topic
  • Community
  • Flame
  • CurrentEvents

Recent posts

According to some, we're a nation of illiterate dependents looking for a handout RobVG October 27, 2025 8:56 pm (CurrentEvents)

The 1% RobVG October 27, 2025 10:54 am (Off-Topic)

Parting Shot ER October 27, 2025 4:36 am (Off-Topic)

Space X put on notice RobVG October 20, 2025 4:55 pm (Space/Science)

There is no bottom to this barrel... RL October 19, 2025 5:40 pm (CurrentEvents)

John Wheeler's philosophy: "Beyond the Black Hole" RL October 16, 2025 10:00 pm (Space/Science)

Brosz baffled, Bondi busts Bolton ER October 16, 2025 2:08 pm (CurrentEvents)

Science backs up what I have been saying for years... RL October 15, 2025 7:59 pm (CurrentEvents)

No sugar tonight in my coffee, no sugar tonight in my tea ER October 15, 2025 5:07 pm (Space/Science)

Only thing surprising is that people are surprised... RL October 15, 2025 7:12 am (CurrentEvents)

Superwood BuckGalaxy October 14, 2025 5:46 pm (Space/Science)

Lucky U! ER October 14, 2025 2:17 pm (Off-Topic)

Home » Flame

A solution to NASA and military cost over-runs. February 11, 2012 12:58 am bowser

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/46334188/ns/technology_and_science-space/#.TzYdKcWLssI

NASA reportedly will slash planetary science to make up for telescope cost overruns

The Mars missions would take $1.4 billion.  The Webb Telescope, originally estimated at $3.5 billion is now up to $8 billion.  $4.5 billion OVER on a $3.5 billion project.  (I know about inflation, which has been quite low, and I don’t care.)

Read about the development of the F-35 and see the same things, and winding up with a near-useless craft.  (One version of the F-35 had it carrying exactly 2 air to air missiles and nothing else.)

The only way to counter this mindset of getting started, just get started, tell ‘em anything but just get started and we’ll have ‘em mentality would be to completely cancel the Webb Telescope.

Take it off the board.  No money for a rocket, sell the scrap to Edmunds and Radio Shack.  None of the “it’s almost done” stuff.  It should have been “almost done” at $3.4 billion, not now.  If you can’t build it right, you can’t run it right, and we’re sorry – after all it’s our money, you’ll get to keep what you’ve been paid.  Hubble was sent up with a faulty mirror, and we had to eat that cost, too.  Perkins-Elmer wasn’t charged a dime.  We’re tired.  Done.

No more.  The unemployment line is downtown, and you are all eligible.  Every damned last one of you, and should have been eligible $4 billion ago.  It would have been much cheaper.

See what happens to other projects downline.

  • Well look on the bright side - at least now the missions cost less than a B-2 bomber :D by VelociraptorBlade 2012-02-11 01:13:13

    Search

    The Control Panel

    • Log in
    • Register