• Space/Science
  • GeekSpeak
  • Mysteries of
    the Multiverse
  • Science Fiction
  • The Comestible Zone
  • Off-Topic
  • Community
  • Flame
  • CurrentEvents

Recent posts

The gecko in the mailbox ER December 18, 2025 4:54 pm (Off-Topic)

Ancient footprints RL December 16, 2025 5:28 pm (Space/Science)

What an unimaginable asshole BuckGalaxy December 15, 2025 9:26 pm (Flame)

We are soooo fucked RL December 15, 2025 6:59 pm (Space/Science)

Day 346 ER December 14, 2025 10:53 am (Space/Science)

In the eye of the beast ER December 14, 2025 7:40 am (Space/Science)

My New Year's Dissolution ER December 12, 2025 7:22 pm (CurrentEvents)

Theories about 16 Psyche BuckGalaxy December 12, 2025 12:34 am (Space/Science)

Mike Lindell, MyPillow Founder, Announces Run for Minnesota Governor BuckGalaxy December 11, 2025 10:30 pm (CurrentEvents)

Trouble in Paradise BuckGalaxy December 10, 2025 8:09 pm (CurrentEvents)

Home » Off-Topic

Aircraft carriers - ramp v. catapult for takeoff. Russian view. September 19, 2013 11:53 pm bowser

http://rusnavy.com/science/hull/russiancarrier/5/

I’ve often wondered about the ramps on other nations aircraft carriers v. the catapults on ours.  Clearly the catapults are more complicated, expensive and heavy.  The citation is a Russian comparison of the two systems.

Extremely interesting.  And it seems as if the steam catapult is on the way out, in favor of an electromagnetic affair.  How that would work I don’t have the slightest.

The Russian conclusion is interesting, and I won’t spoil matters by revealing the outcome.

  • Fascinating website for an old sailor.. by ER 2013-09-20 04:01:55
    • What I find particularly troubling... by ER 2013-09-20 07:00:47
      • The US Navy is the largest imperialistic force in the world. by bowser 2013-09-20 10:58:17
        • Good grief. I'm fighting a two-front war here. by ER 2013-09-20 13:10:38

    Search

    The Control Panel

    • Log in
    • Register