• Space/Science
  • GeekSpeak
  • Mysteries of
    the Multiverse
  • Science Fiction
  • The Comestible Zone
  • Off-Topic
  • Community
  • Flame
  • CurrentEvents

Recent posts

Science backs up what I have been saying for years... RL October 15, 2025 7:59 pm (CurrentEvents)

No sugar tonight in my coffee, no sugar tonight in my tea ER October 15, 2025 5:07 pm (Space/Science)

Only thing surprising is that people are surprised... RL October 15, 2025 7:12 am (CurrentEvents)

Superwood BuckGalaxy October 14, 2025 5:46 pm (Space/Science)

Lucky U! ER October 14, 2025 2:17 pm (Off-Topic)

Lucky me? ER October 14, 2025 9:51 am (Off-Topic)

JPL about to lose ANOTHER 11% of its people RL October 13, 2025 12:00 pm (Space/Science)

Enjoy this and share.... RL October 13, 2025 3:36 am (CurrentEvents)

Already gutted, the CDC faces more brutal cuts RL October 11, 2025 9:45 pm (Space/Science)

A.Indecency RL October 11, 2025 9:37 pm (GeekSpeak)

Dark matter stars RL October 11, 2025 9:01 pm (Space/Science)

R-E-S-P-E-C-T BuckGalaxy October 11, 2025 12:52 pm (Flame)

Home » CurrentEvents

Hey, Paula June 30, 2013 11:15 am ER

I believe it is unfortunate that Paula Deen’s career as a TV chef appears to be in an unrecoverable death spiral. Hell, even Martha Stewart made a comeback after being jailed for securities fraud. She was actually convicted of a serious crime.

OK, so maybe Deen made some racist remarks a few years ago, in a private setting. But so what? She has and should be criticized for this, but to demolish her entire public persona over some thoughtless words (and let’s be honest, who hasn’t done the same at some time or another?) is terribly unfair. She has made numerous public apologies, offered extravagant contrition, and suffered severe public humiliation enough already. Let the punishment fit the crime.

A sincere public disapproval of language or behavior is one thing, but Paula’s actions are not, and should not be a crime, just bad manners. Once made public knowlege and publicly condemned, she should be forgiven and we should move on. I suppose her sponsors have the right to reject her services if they feel it is in their financial interest, and her customers have the right to reject her products if they find her actions that objectionable. But those should be free choices, not a code enforced by some self-appointed morality police.

¡Basta, ya! Enough already! Leave the poor woman alone.

  • Her employers fired her. They were not exactly "self-appointed". by alcaray 2013-06-30 11:34:01
    • I agree. by Jody 2013-06-30 11:26:07
      • I stopped using that word a number of years ago... by FrankC 2013-07-01 10:52:47
        • Recommended reading. by ER 2013-06-30 11:40:25

        Search

        The Control Panel

        • Log in
        • Register