• Space/Science
  • GeekSpeak
  • Mysteries of
    the Multiverse
  • Science Fiction
  • The Comestible Zone
  • Off-Topic
  • Community
  • Flame
  • CurrentEvents

Recent posts

It's a long long road... BuckGalaxy March 26, 2026 4:49 pm (Space/Science)

Lax Americana BuckGalaxy March 24, 2026 1:18 pm (CurrentEvents)

Glad... BuckGalaxy March 21, 2026 4:30 pm (Flame)

Blu-Ray ER March 15, 2026 11:27 am (Off-Topic)

Trump Administration Readies Plans to Dismantle Renowned Science Lab BuckGalaxy March 13, 2026 11:46 pm (Space/Science)

The Republic RobVG March 11, 2026 11:40 am (Off-Topic)

The Great Lie of War BuckGalaxy March 5, 2026 9:23 am (CurrentEvents)

Overheard on the internet... ER March 4, 2026 4:37 pm (CurrentEvents)

I hate waking up to war podrock February 28, 2026 11:04 am (CurrentEvents)

The religion of nonreligion can be like nonalcohol beer: What’s the point? BuckGalaxy February 28, 2026 2:25 am (Off-Topic)

MAGAlomania unleashed again BuckGalaxy February 28, 2026 2:21 am (CurrentEvents)

Home » Space/Science

Speaking of Google Mars... August 11, 2012 10:54 am ER

There is a large area of the planet, a roughly rectangular region between Lat 50 and 30 S and Lon 80 and 60 E in Hellas Planitia where the data is washed out and colorless, almost white. Topography is barely visible. It apears that the data itself is bad, since the N-S orbital paths of the satellite sensors are clearly visible.

I’ve done quite a bit of cruising of the surface on Google Mars and I’ve never noticed this before. It appears that this is new, poorly processed data which has been overlain on the existing imagery, or perhaps it is recent data imaged during a dust storm and which was slapped on top of older imagery. Surface detail is quite badly obscured.

Can anyone shed some light on this?

  • Your speculations are the same as mine. by podrock 2012-08-11 11:19:08

    Search

    The Control Panel

    • Log in
    • Register