• Space/Science
  • GeekSpeak
  • Mysteries of
    the Multiverse
  • Science Fiction
  • The Comestible Zone
  • Off-Topic
  • Community
  • Flame
  • CurrentEvents

Recent posts

Day 346 ER December 14, 2025 10:53 am (Space/Science)

In the eye of the beast ER December 14, 2025 7:40 am (Space/Science)

My New Year's Dissolution ER December 12, 2025 7:22 pm (CurrentEvents)

Theories about 16 Psyche BuckGalaxy December 12, 2025 12:34 am (Space/Science)

Mike Lindell, MyPillow Founder, Announces Run for Minnesota Governor BuckGalaxy December 11, 2025 10:30 pm (CurrentEvents)

Trouble in Paradise BuckGalaxy December 10, 2025 8:09 pm (CurrentEvents)

The Prisoner Survives BuckGalaxy December 9, 2025 9:16 pm (Off-Topic)

La Doctrina Monroe ER December 9, 2025 9:56 am (CurrentEvents)

Its a beautiful day in the neighborhood.... ER December 8, 2025 7:04 pm (Space/Science)

Alien Physiology and the Meaning of Life BuckGalaxy December 8, 2025 5:37 pm (Off-Topic)

Home » Flame

"Those who can afford it the least." October 30, 2014 9:31 am bowser

I’m very suspicious of the current political ads which urge a vote one way or the other to protect “those who can afford it the least”.  This concern for the poor as expressed in a barrage of ads paid for by the larger corporations ring hollow to me.  Right now it’s about labeling genetically modified foods.  All a once, “those who can afford it the least” will bear a tremendous burden if that is enacted.

In my State, “those who can afford it the least” are stomped on regularly in the taxes, fees, and practices such as legalized gambling which impact them directly.  No one cares.  And watch out of large corporations all at once seem to have an interest in protecting them.

  • Corporations are not people, my friend. by hank 2014-10-30 10:34:05
    • I probably wasn't clear. by bowser 2014-11-02 16:38:32
      • Cost/benefit analysis. by hank 2014-11-02 19:29:00

    Search

    The Control Panel

    • Log in
    • Register