• Space/Science
  • GeekSpeak
  • Mysteries of
    the Multiverse
  • Science Fiction
  • The Comestible Zone
  • Off-Topic
  • Community
  • Flame
  • CurrentEvents

Recent posts

Posting just a title line sometimes links to an empty body. RobVG November 5, 2025 1:02 pm (GeekSpeak)

Trump nominates a NASA chief — again BuckGalaxy November 4, 2025 10:28 pm (Space/Science)

Muskfinger - and other evil space billionaires BuckGalaxy November 4, 2025 10:19 pm (Space/Science)

New Glenn set for its second launch on November 9 BuckGalaxy November 4, 2025 9:15 pm (Space/Science)

Spanberger projected to win VA BuckGalaxy November 4, 2025 5:10 pm (CurrentEvents)

The destruction of Goddard is illegal RL October 31, 2025 9:41 am (Space/Science)

Weighing the scales on Elon Musk BuckGalaxy October 30, 2025 9:28 pm (Flame)

Bunker Envy ? podrock October 30, 2025 6:18 pm (CurrentEvents)

Message in a bottle BuckGalaxy October 29, 2025 10:55 am (Off-Topic)

According to some, we're a nation of illiterate dependents looking for a handout RobVG October 27, 2025 8:56 pm (CurrentEvents)

The 1% RobVG October 27, 2025 10:54 am (Off-Topic)

Home » Mysteries of the Multiverse

ER, You asked: What are you trying to tell us? March 19, 2014 5:15 pm johannes

My answer to that question is that I am trying to tell you very many things in a very compact/compressed form, unfortunately I can not take the time and effort to go into minute details of every aspect of what I am trying to tell, so, instead, I’ll point out some things that I find very interesting in the relativistic universe.

You wrote that: “Einstein showed us mass and energy are intimately related, they are two aspects of the same thing” . I agree with that statement, but Einstein’s theory does not explain exactly how mass and energy are related, in other words: If energy and mass are two separate entities how do they combine to form the mass/energy unit? Or another way of asking the question is: What is “mass,” and what is “energy”?

One thing I am trying to tell you is that the formula that I posted here gives a better definition, or understanding, of the structure of mass and energy and how they are combined.

I also agree that time and space can not be separated, I also agree that space and time can change, but I disagree with the statement that the speed of light always is the same. I agree that there is a universal constant associated with the speed of light, but it is not the speed itself that is constant, but the acceleration that the photons obtain when leaving the source.

That is what the posted “simple” mathematical formula represents.

  • How are you mistaken? Let me count the ways. by ER 2014-03-19 17:43:11
    • I am a curious type, so I need more answers than most. by johannes 2014-03-22 12:17:54
      • The difference between hypothesis and speculation... by ER 2014-03-22 13:02:18
        • *phase space by ER 2014-03-22 13:40:01
          • It is interesting that by johannes 2014-03-28 20:19:24
            • Your equation is identical to Einstein's. by ER 2014-03-28 21:16:43
              • If a ton of lead falls on a person it will hurt much more than a ton of featers would. by johannes 2014-05-21 11:33:46
                • No. by ER 2014-05-21 13:42:44
                  • Exactly my point, but I'm taking the explanation to the sub atomic level, not only that, by johannes 2014-05-22 19:58:45
                    • Have you gone out west yet? by ER 2014-05-22 21:06:00
                      • Was lucky I suppose ;-) by johannes 2014-05-23 22:44:31
                        • Government Man . . . by DanS 2014-05-24 09:11:33
                          • A jack-booted statist oppressor of free men. by ER 2014-05-24 06:00:33
                            • Thanks guys, I'm still learning things, so, I can't be over the hill yet. by johannes 2014-05-25 16:27:28
                      • Basic physics. (n/t) by DanS 2014-05-22 13:22:20

        Search

        The Control Panel

        • Log in
        • Register