• Space/Science
  • GeekSpeak
  • Mysteries of
    the Multiverse
  • Science Fiction
  • The Comestible Zone
  • Off-Topic
  • Community
  • Flame
  • CurrentEvents

Recent posts

The April numbers ER May 8, 2025 5:59 am (Space/Science)

The Orange Criminal POS abandons another ally BuckGalaxy May 7, 2025 10:18 am (CurrentEvents)

Orion spacecraft for crewed Artemis II lunar mission ready BuckGalaxy May 3, 2025 8:13 pm (Space/Science)

Australia election more bad news conservatives BuckGalaxy May 3, 2025 11:54 am (CurrentEvents)

Massive cuts to NASA budget proposed BuckGalaxy May 3, 2025 9:19 am (Space/Science)

Say what? ER May 1, 2025 8:53 pm (CurrentEvents)

Radio Broadcasts BuckGalaxy May 1, 2025 12:28 pm (Space/Science)

The Last of Us BuckGalaxy April 30, 2025 12:37 pm (Science Fiction)

You can't make this stuff up... RobVG April 29, 2025 1:43 pm (CurrentEvents)

It's election day in Canada RobVG April 28, 2025 2:26 pm (CurrentEvents)

K2-18b BuckGalaxy April 21, 2025 12:07 pm (Space/Science)

Home » Mysteries of the Multiverse

Einstein got the outcome of the calculation E= mc^2 figured out correctly but March 15, 2014 6:46 pm johannes
 he did not explain the formula in such a way that everyone would understand it.
He said that you must multiply the highest possible speed with the same figure and then multiply it by the amount of mass to see how much energy is involved in the quantity of mass.
Even though the result is correct, I always had difficulty understanding what the highest possible speed multiplied by itself represented.
Had he explained that mass has a surface area that must be represented by squaring the mass figure and then by multiplying the fastest speed that the mass is already experiencing by the square of the mass and then dividing the total by the mass number and multiplying the total with the highest possible speed that the mass can be accelerated to,
 then it will give the total amount of energy that the quantity of mass can possibly have, or had he said to read Genesis and understand it, then it would have been so much easier to grasp the function of the cosmos.

Alternately, he could have given us the formula, E= c*m^2/m*c

  • Why are your posts not wrapped? by FrankC 2014-03-16 13:44:01
    • You are right, I'm using another writing appliccation now. by johannes 2014-03-16 17:59:36
    • E= c*m^2/m*c can be simplified by ER 2014-03-15 19:18:01
      • The world's quickest derivation of E=mc^2 by ER 2014-03-15 19:41:00
        • Perhaps I did not use the proper way of representing the formula. by johannes 2014-03-16 17:57:20
          • E = cm^2 divided by m and multiplied by c. by ER 2014-03-16 19:17:05
            • I see what you mean, so lets try another method. by johannes 2014-03-17 13:24:09
              • What is U? by ER 2014-03-17 17:34:01
                • J.--If you want to talk science, or discuss speculative ideas about science (that's allowed, even welcome, on the Zone); ... by ER 2014-03-17 20:32:56
                  • Thanks for the information. by johannes 2014-03-17 21:15:59

      Search

      The Control Panel

      • Log in
      • Register