• Space/Science
  • GeekSpeak
  • Mysteries of
    the Multiverse
  • Science Fiction
  • The Comestible Zone
  • Off-Topic
  • Community
  • Flame
  • CurrentEvents

Recent posts

Clare Torry RobVG August 26, 2025 7:42 pm (Off-Topic)

Lateral Thinking BuckGalaxy August 23, 2025 11:57 am (Off-Topic)

SNW: The Finest Frontier BuckGalaxy August 23, 2025 12:20 am (Science Fiction)

There's more than Floyd RobVG August 20, 2025 12:24 am (Off-Topic)

Existing instrument on Mars Curiosity Rover could be used to detect life BuckGalaxy August 18, 2025 12:48 pm (Space/Science)

Trump grovels BuckGalaxy August 17, 2025 12:43 pm (CurrentEvents)

Alien:Earth RobVG August 16, 2025 1:44 pm (Science Fiction)

"Project Hail Mary" RobVG August 14, 2025 11:12 am (Science Fiction)

The July numbers (Edited 8/13) ER August 11, 2025 3:48 pm (Space/Science)

Houston, we have a problem BuckGalaxy August 8, 2025 2:50 pm (Space/Science)

Nagasaki memories ER August 6, 2025 1:51 pm (Off-Topic)

Afrikaan- American news ER August 5, 2025 8:01 am (CurrentEvents)

Home » Space/Science

Asteroid mining December 7, 2012 2:29 pm TB

A sort of continuation of the discussion below, which was creeping off my screen.

A short thought experiment I did some years back.

That’s a lot of money for just one asteroid.

Large quantities of resources are best moved through space on slow orbits, in a train of intermittent launches to create a “pipeline.” Think coal moving on trains across a continent. Mass drivers can launch simple metals and ores from asteroids, and theoretically a “mass catcher” can retrieve them at the other end, although this is tricky. Atmospheric braking of giant masses of metal is not something I’d like to bring up to an insurance company. The more refining and “cooking down” you can do onsite, the less the transportation becomes an issue.

  • Something the earlier thread overlooked: Energy. by podrock 2012-12-07 15:50:24

    Search

    The Control Panel

    • Log in
    • Register