• Space/Science
  • GeekSpeak
  • Mysteries of
    the Multiverse
  • Science Fiction
  • The Comestible Zone
  • Off-Topic
  • Community
  • Flame
  • CurrentEvents

Recent posts

Not ready for prime time BuckGalaxy June 19, 2025 12:18 pm (Space/Science)

hypocrisy ER June 15, 2025 2:30 pm (Flame)

NSIDC offline? ER June 12, 2025 12:19 pm (Space/Science)

Wouldn't it be nice BuckGalaxy June 11, 2025 3:13 pm (Off-Topic)

Thank You Falettinme Be Mice Elf Agin BuckGalaxy June 9, 2025 1:35 pm (Off-Topic)

So, it is official RL June 6, 2025 5:39 pm (Space/Science)

"Remember, what the dormouse said, ER June 5, 2025 4:14 pm (Space/Science)

"Make my day" BuckGalaxy June 5, 2025 1:08 pm (CurrentEvents)

NSIDC Data drop ER June 4, 2025 9:34 pm (Space/Science)

Boulder will be in your news soon. podrock June 1, 2025 3:14 pm (CurrentEvents)

It's over folks RL June 1, 2025 12:38 pm (Space/Science)

Administration solves things the old fashion way BuckGalaxy June 1, 2025 11:01 am (Flame)

Home » Space/Science

Asteroid mining December 7, 2012 2:29 pm TB

A sort of continuation of the discussion below, which was creeping off my screen.

A short thought experiment I did some years back.

That’s a lot of money for just one asteroid.

Large quantities of resources are best moved through space on slow orbits, in a train of intermittent launches to create a “pipeline.” Think coal moving on trains across a continent. Mass drivers can launch simple metals and ores from asteroids, and theoretically a “mass catcher” can retrieve them at the other end, although this is tricky. Atmospheric braking of giant masses of metal is not something I’d like to bring up to an insurance company. The more refining and “cooking down” you can do onsite, the less the transportation becomes an issue.

  • Something the earlier thread overlooked: Energy. by podrock 2012-12-07 15:50:24

    Search

    The Control Panel

    • Log in
    • Register