• Space/Science
  • GeekSpeak
  • Mysteries of
    the Multiverse
  • Science Fiction
  • The Comestible Zone
  • Off-Topic
  • Community
  • Flame
  • CurrentEvents

Recent posts

Trouble on the way BuckGalaxy January 28, 2026 1:47 pm (CurrentEvents)

Being a tech bro gets you a commission and a uniform podrock January 28, 2026 11:16 am (CurrentEvents)

Artificial Intelligence ER January 28, 2026 6:56 am (Flame)

Emily Blunt's favorite sandwich. ER January 27, 2026 7:46 am (Comestible Zone)

hey hey SDG January 26, 2026 10:38 pm (6)

‘Yes, it’s going to crack’ - a spacecraft not everyone thinks is safe to fly BuckGalaxy January 23, 2026 10:42 am (Flame)

Trump’s Greenland Gambit Has Broken Brains Across Washington BuckGalaxy January 21, 2026 8:38 pm (Flame)

This is so strange, on so many levels. ER January 21, 2026 5:13 pm (Off-Topic)

What's in your wallet? ER January 19, 2026 8:10 pm (CurrentEvents)

Anne Applebaum: Trump’s Letter to Norway Should Be the Last Straw BuckGalaxy January 19, 2026 7:18 pm (Flame)

Sloppy Seconds BuckGalaxy January 16, 2026 7:24 pm (Flame)

Trump's irrational fixation on Greenland could lead to widespread conflict. BuckGalaxy January 14, 2026 10:48 pm (Flame)

Home » CurrentEvents

The neural whip March 12, 2012 5:44 am ER

http://news.yahoo.com/us-military-unveils-non-lethal-heat-ray-weapon-032512781.html

In one of Asimov’s stories, his characters use a non-lethal weapon called a “neural whip”, to discourage attacks by hostile aliens or beasts. It causes intense pain at a distance, but no injury.

“Non-lethal weapons” is an oxymoron. Everything which stops short of killing, such as fire hoses, tear gas, incapacitating agents, rubber bullets, cattle prods, etc, is to be preferred to gunfire from a humane standpoint, but even panic in a crowd can cause death. And anything that incapacitates a healthy young adult has the potential to hurt the old, young, or the seriously wounded. Even if the potential for injury is reduced, it is made up for by the increased temptation to use the weapon because it is “harmless”. Our experience with tasers has already shown abuses.

I guess it always come down to whether the unruly target is a dangerous mob, or peacefully assembled citizen demonstrators. Unfortunately, its always the side with the guns who gets to make that judgement.

All the technology in the world doesn’t free you from the responsibility of making a moral choice. But it can make you forget that you still have the responsibility to do so.

  • I agree with what you are saying. AND, what a way to scan for snipers!!! If it has ... by bowser 2012-03-12 17:54:18
    • I think crowd control is more what they had in mind. by ER 2012-03-12 18:46:59
    • True, true. I always hate it when people praise new "non-lethal" weapons. If it can be used to harm ... by VelociraptorBlade 2012-03-12 14:41:10

      Search

      The Control Panel

      • Log in
      • Register