• Space/Science
  • GeekSpeak
  • Mysteries of
    the Multiverse
  • Science Fiction
  • The Comestible Zone
  • Off-Topic
  • Community
  • Flame
  • CurrentEvents

Recent posts

According to some, we're a nation of illiterate dependents looking for a handout RobVG October 27, 2025 8:56 pm (CurrentEvents)

The 1% RobVG October 27, 2025 10:54 am (Off-Topic)

Parting Shot ER October 27, 2025 4:36 am (Off-Topic)

Space X put on notice RobVG October 20, 2025 4:55 pm (Space/Science)

There is no bottom to this barrel... RL October 19, 2025 5:40 pm (CurrentEvents)

John Wheeler's philosophy: "Beyond the Black Hole" RL October 16, 2025 10:00 pm (Space/Science)

Brosz baffled, Bondi busts Bolton ER October 16, 2025 2:08 pm (CurrentEvents)

Science backs up what I have been saying for years... RL October 15, 2025 7:59 pm (CurrentEvents)

No sugar tonight in my coffee, no sugar tonight in my tea ER October 15, 2025 5:07 pm (Space/Science)

Only thing surprising is that people are surprised... RL October 15, 2025 7:12 am (CurrentEvents)

Superwood BuckGalaxy October 14, 2025 5:46 pm (Space/Science)

Lucky U! ER October 14, 2025 2:17 pm (Off-Topic)

Home » CurrentEvents

The neural whip March 12, 2012 5:44 am ER

http://news.yahoo.com/us-military-unveils-non-lethal-heat-ray-weapon-032512781.html

In one of Asimov’s stories, his characters use a non-lethal weapon called a “neural whip”, to discourage attacks by hostile aliens or beasts. It causes intense pain at a distance, but no injury.

“Non-lethal weapons” is an oxymoron. Everything which stops short of killing, such as fire hoses, tear gas, incapacitating agents, rubber bullets, cattle prods, etc, is to be preferred to gunfire from a humane standpoint, but even panic in a crowd can cause death. And anything that incapacitates a healthy young adult has the potential to hurt the old, young, or the seriously wounded. Even if the potential for injury is reduced, it is made up for by the increased temptation to use the weapon because it is “harmless”. Our experience with tasers has already shown abuses.

I guess it always come down to whether the unruly target is a dangerous mob, or peacefully assembled citizen demonstrators. Unfortunately, its always the side with the guns who gets to make that judgement.

All the technology in the world doesn’t free you from the responsibility of making a moral choice. But it can make you forget that you still have the responsibility to do so.

  • I agree with what you are saying. AND, what a way to scan for snipers!!! If it has ... by bowser 2012-03-12 17:54:18
    • I think crowd control is more what they had in mind. by ER 2012-03-12 18:46:59
    • True, true. I always hate it when people praise new "non-lethal" weapons. If it can be used to harm ... by VelociraptorBlade 2012-03-12 14:41:10

      Search

      The Control Panel

      • Log in
      • Register