Probably not.

Space Sciences

Probably not.

Posted by

REB

on

3/24/2008 11:49:40 AM

In Reply to: One has to wonder posted by Socrates II on 3/22/2008 8:56:41 PM

Maybe it did not wipe out anyone. The universe is supposed to be around 13.7 billion years old. So when this happed, the Universe was around 6 billion years old. We had to have the first generation of stars create heavy elements and a suitable world formed first. I am not sure if there was enough time.

Table of contents

Replies:

Naked-eye Gamma Ray Burst - Johannes - 3/21/2008 4:50:25 PM
- re: Naked-eye Gamma Ray Burst - Raoul - 3/22/2008 12:51:36 AM
- Thanks Johannes - McFly - 3/21/2008 7:03:46 PM
  - I really can't. - Bowser - 3/24/2008 9:32:11 PM
  - One has to wonder - Socrates II - 3/22/2008 8:56:41 PM
    - Probably not. - REB - 3/24/2008 11:49:40 AM
    - re: Incomprehensible - Johannes - 3/23/2008 5:41:01 PM
      - re: Incomprehensible - Marcia - 3/24/2008 6:11:25 PM
        re: Thank you Marcia - Johannes - 3/25/2008 6:46:10 PM
        re: Thank you Marcia - Marcia - 3/27/2008 5:46:52 AM
        re: Thank you for the links. - Johannes - 3/27/2008 3:19:08 PM
      - For those who are looking for other "signs" of the Universe "acknowledging" AC Clarke's death - Socrates II - 3/24/2008 5:16:20 AM
        re: For those who are looking for other "signs" of the Universe "acknowledging" AC Clarke's death - Marcia - 3/24/2008 5:45:04 PM
        Observations of the Naked-Eye GRB 080319B: Implications of Nature's Brightest Explosion - Socrates II - 3/26/2008 8:17:51 PM
        This guy wants to name the GRB ... - Socrates II - 3/26/2008 8:30:30 PM

Message URL / 65.16.160.178 / Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; (R1 1.5); .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)