re: Spherules are not concretions, as previously hypothesized

Replies:

Spherules are not concretions, as previously hypothesized - Philip Simon - 10/11/2004 4:42:31 PM
- They seem localized to the Meridiani region. - REB - 10/13/2004 5:32:09 AM
  - re: They seem localized to the Meridiani region. - Nick Hoffman - 10/14/2004 1:05:11 AM
    - re: They seem localized to the Meridiani region. - REB - 10/14/2004 5:34:05 AM
    - re: They seem localized to the Meridiani region. - REB - 10/14/2004 4:48:28 AM
      - uhhh - here ya go - E.P. Grondine - 10/14/2004 6:10:06 PM
      - Good. - Nick Hoffman - 10/14/2004 7:05:37 AM
        re: Good. - REB - 10/14/2004 7:10:35 AM
- re: Spherules are not concretions, as previously hypothesized - REB - 10/12/2004 7:36:49 AM
- re: Spherules are not concretions, as previously hypothesized - Nick Hoffman - 10/11/2004 9:39:29 PM
  - re: Spherules are not concretions, as previously hypothesized - bruced - 10/13/2004 4:30:10 PM
    - increased local crystallinity - Philip Simon - 10/14/2004 4:40:24 PM
      - re: increased local crystallinity - bruced - 10/15/2004 1:25:12 AM
        Surface films - Nick Hoffman - 10/15/2004 4:57:50 PM
  - re: Spherules are not concretions, as previously hypothesized - E.P. Grondine - 10/12/2004 7:03:28 AM
- link please, sounds interesting. (n/t) - jms - 10/11/2004 6:56:45 PM
  - re: link please, sounds interesting. - Marcia - 10/11/2004 9:51:50 PM
    - Thanks Marcia, I'll take notes. - jms - 10/11/2004 9:59:50 PM
- Yeah, they're tectites - E.P. Grondine - 10/11/2004 5:55:38 PM
  - re: Yeah, you're a geologist (n/t) - Mark Eby - 10/11/2004 6:43:58 PM
    - No, I just get tired of the Mars Nuts' BS (n/t) - E.P. Grondine - 10/11/2004 7:04:24 PM
      - re: If you explained how they could be tektites it would be more interesting. You Moon Nut. (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 10/12/2004 2:07:21 AM