Flame
Not sure how that follows
Posted by TB on 5/5/2008 5:58:57 PM
In Reply to: If Republicans gave a rat's rump about "popular vote" then they would not have winner-take-all primaries. posted by alcaray on 5/5/2008 5:23:00 PM
Elections are, by nature, "winner take all." I don't get why a primary set up that way is necessarily "anti-voter."

Bush got picked once. Every party runs the incumbent for the next election. The guy he beat out is running now--so it goes.

The primary process is so erratic it's not much better than drawing straws in my opinion.

Table of contents
Replies:
Message URL / 66.167.126.226 / Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.648)