Replies:

• Should science be guided by morality? (n/t) - Jody - 4/27/2008 4:06:17 PM
  • I am a stem cell research advocate - Jody - 4/28/2008 6:57:18 PM
    • So, really is Bush. - Bowser - 4/29/2008 10:23:24 AM
      • ...and I will be more than happy to research your stem...awoka woka (n/t) - Jody - 4/29/2008 1:04:37 PM
        • Just stay out of his genes (n/t) - ARRELL - 4/30/2008 11:32:31 AM
          • No DNA swapping! (n/t) - Tony - 5/1/2008 12:29:54 PM
        • What're you celling? (n/t) - Bowser - 4/29/2008 1:18:13 PM
          • proper stimulation (n/t) - Jody - 4/29/2008 2:36:29 PM
            • Don't you mean stem-ulation? (n/t) - ER - 4/30/2008 5:25:59 AM
              • Damn! I wish I had thought of that! (n/t) - Jody - 4/30/2008 8:29:51 AM
                • You didn't? What WERE you thinking? :-) (n/t) - Bowser - 4/30/2008 12:47:53 PM
  • Eugenics is science guided by morality, but not many support the idea. - Lee - 4/28/2008 10:48:28 AM
    • re: Eugenics is science guided by morality, but not many support the idea. - gbaikie - 4/28/2008 7:05:27 PM
      • "Killing a fewer people for the sake of theoretical many is immoral. Limiting the happiness of a fewer people for the sake of a theoretical many, is immoral. " - ARRELL - 4/30/2008 1:08:53 PM
        • re: "Killing a fewer people for the sake of theoretical many is immoral. Limiting the happiness of a fewer people for the sake of a theoretical many, is immoral. " - gbaikie - 4/30/2008 4:51:59 PM
      • "I would be happy to kill any scientist or doctor...", anyone missing the irony here....? - ARRELL - 4/29/2008 6:18:48 AM
        • Eugenics occurs everyday in this country. - Lee - 4/29/2008 1:31:27 PM
        • re: "I would be happy to kill any scientist or doctor...", anyone missing the irony here....? - gbaikie - 4/29/2008 12:04:58 PM
          • "I would be happy to kill any scientist or doctor" .... "No, I wouldn't be happy "to kill any scientist or doctor..."" - ARRELL - 4/30/2008 2:17:01 PM
            • re: "I would be happy to kill any scientist or doctor" .... "No, I wouldn't be happy "to kill any scientist or doctor..."" - gbaikie - 4/30/2008 6:34:59 PM
              • Apparently YOU are the ONLY one that missed the fundamental contradictions in your post... - ARRELL - 4/30/2008 6:55:27 PM
                • re: Apparently YOU are the ONLY one that missed the fundamental contradictions in your post... - gbaikie - 4/30/2008 8:39:15 PM
                  • re: Apparently YOU are the ONLY one that missed the fundamental contradictions in your post... - ARRELL - 5/2/2008 12:49:08 AM
                    • Post by Herb removed. - moderite podrock - 5/2/2008 12:50:26 PM
        • Word substitution exercise--reductio ad adsurdum - ER - 4/29/2008 7:48:44 AM
          • re: Word substitution exercise--reductio ad adsurdum - gbaikie - 4/29/2008 12:28:08 PM
            • I think "All the above posts [ER and ARRELL] are perfect examples of..." - alcaray - 4/29/2008 1:03:05 PM
              • *giggle* (n/t) - Jody - 4/29/2008 1:06:14 PM
          • re: More Irony - Yeti - 4/29/2008 9:30:13 AM
  • AU, contraire. Morality should be guided by science... - nick hoffman - 4/28/2008 4:51:35 AM
    • Good morality IS science. - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/29/2008 5:01:47 PM
    • Nice! I like that (n/t) - McFly - 4/29/2008 2:09:38 PM
    • re: AU, contraire. Morality should be guided by science... - gbaikie - 4/28/2008 6:34:08 PM
      • "Name one" - ARRELL - 4/29/2008 6:23:04 AM
    • Excellent point. And indeed, sometimes it is. - Bowser - 4/28/2008 10:08:26 AM
  • Science itself? No. - Mary Anne - 4/27/2008 9:28:13 PM
  • Science should not be guided by morality. - ER - 4/27/2008 4:59:45 PM
  • Which morality? Whose? Regarding what? - Bowser - 4/27/2008 4:16:50 PM
  • And: Should morality be guided by science? - podrock - 4/27/2008 4:14:58 PM