Don't you mean stem-ulation?

Replies:

Should science be guided by morality? (n/t) - Jody - 4/27/2008 4:06:17 PM
- I am a stem cell research advocate - Jody - 4/28/2008 6:57:18 PM
  - So, really is Bush. - Bowser - 4/29/2008 10:23:24 AM
    - ...and I will be more than happy to research your stem...awoka woka (n/t) - Jody - 4/29/2008 1:04:37 PM
      - Just stay out of his genes (n/t) - ARRELL - 4/30/2008 11:32:31 AM
        No DNA swapping! (n/t) - Tony - 5/1/2008 12:29:54 PM
      - What're you celling? (n/t) - Bowser - 4/29/2008 1:18:13 PM
        proper stimulation (n/t) - Jody - 4/29/2008 2:36:29 PM
        Don't you mean stem-ulation? (n/t) - ER - 4/30/2008 5:25:59 AM
        Damn! I wish I had thought of that! (n/t) - Jody - 4/30/2008 8:29:51 AM
        You didn't? What WERE you thinking? :-) (n/t) - Bowser - 4/30/2008 12:47:53 PM
- Eugenics is science guided by morality, but not many support the idea. - Lee - 4/28/2008 10:48:28 AM
  - re: Eugenics is science guided by morality, but not many support the idea. - gbaikie - 4/28/2008 7:05:27 PM
    - "Killing a fewer people for the sake of theoretical many is immoral. Limiting the happiness of a fewer people for the sake of a theoretical many, is immoral. " - ARRELL - 4/30/2008 1:08:53 PM
      - re: "Killing a fewer people for the sake of theoretical many is immoral. Limiting the happiness of a fewer people for the sake of a theoretical many, is immoral. " - gbaikie - 4/30/2008 4:51:59 PM
    - "I would be happy to kill any scientist or doctor...", anyone missing the irony here....? - ARRELL - 4/29/2008 6:18:48 AM
      - Eugenics occurs everyday in this country. - Lee - 4/29/2008 1:31:27 PM
      - re: "I would be happy to kill any scientist or doctor...", anyone missing the irony here....? - gbaikie - 4/29/2008 12:04:58 PM
        "I would be happy to kill any scientist or doctor" .... "No, I wouldn't be happy "to kill any scientist or doctor..."" - ARRELL - 4/30/2008 2:17:01 PM
        re: "I would be happy to kill any scientist or doctor" .... "No, I wouldn't be happy "to kill any scientist or doctor..."" - gbaikie - 4/30/2008 6:34:59 PM
        Apparently YOU are the ONLY one that missed the fundamental contradictions in your post... - ARRELL - 4/30/2008 6:55:27 PM
        re: Apparently YOU are the ONLY one that missed the fundamental contradictions in your post... - gbaikie - 4/30/2008 8:39:15 PM
        re: Apparently YOU are the ONLY one that missed the fundamental contradictions in your post... - ARRELL - 5/2/2008 12:49:08 AM
        Post by Herb removed. - moderite podrock - 5/2/2008 12:50:26 PM
      - Word substitution exercise--reductio ad adsurdum - ER - 4/29/2008 7:48:44 AM
        re: Word substitution exercise--reductio ad adsurdum - gbaikie - 4/29/2008 12:28:08 PM
        I think "All the above posts [ER and ARRELL] are perfect examples of..." - alcaray - 4/29/2008 1:03:05 PM
        *giggle* (n/t) - Jody - 4/29/2008 1:06:14 PM
        
        re: More Irony - Yeti - 4/29/2008 9:30:13 AM
- AU, contraire. Morality should be guided by science... - nick hoffman - 4/28/2008 4:51:35 AM
  - Good morality IS science. - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/29/2008 5:01:47 PM
  - Nice! I like that (n/t) - McFly - 4/29/2008 2:09:38 PM
  - re: AU, contraire. Morality should be guided by science... - gbaikie - 4/28/2008 6:34:08 PM
    - "Name one" - ARRELL - 4/29/2008 6:23:04 AM
  - Excellent point. And indeed, sometimes it is. - Bowser - 4/28/2008 10:08:26 AM
- Science itself? No. - Mary Anne - 4/27/2008 9:28:13 PM
- Science should not be guided by morality. - ER - 4/27/2008 4:59:45 PM
- Which morality? Whose? Regarding what? - Bowser - 4/27/2008 4:16:50 PM
- And: Should morality be guided by science? - podrock - 4/27/2008 4:14:58 PM