http://space.newscientist.com/channel/space-tech/space-shuttle/mg13117854.400
Since you missed it.
Mr. Ellison, my first suggestion to you when you arrived here that you put a simple copyright warning on each page of your site to benefit its participants led to charges by you on your own site (not a common carrier) that I intended to steal their images.
Dr. Morrison's activities to suppress work on Clube and Napier's hypothesis are well known. The NEO task got assigned to JPL, not Ames, and it was not my decision. I simply report the news, and his involvement in the firing of my Native American source for that story, along with his later abuses of the securtiy process, will be used in his dismissal after the next election.
As far as Blackwell goes, that his work promoting a vision of watery Mars regularly violated the laws of physics weill be evident very soon.
For yourself, the book from JPL on the rovers came about as I predicted.
Mr. Vancil's and Mr. Eby's roles as my stalkers are well known.
Which leaves us RL: R*b*rt L*f*n, or Low-watt, as I like to call him, a man too ashamed to use his real name.
Well, much of what he is pointing to as the result of global warming is the result of the ozone holes, see above.
I have enjoyed your own site because amateur reproceesing shows exactly how much more impact data could have been recovered by professionals from earlier imaging probes
In the next 20 years there will be private autonomous rovers operating on Mars. I hope you're not involved.
In 2021, China will build CAPS.
Cao Knee Men, Photoshop Wienie
BTW, the Congress has passed legislation which:
1) Instructed NASA not to work on manned flight to Mars, and
2) Deal with the impact hazard
The first is a bit extreme, in my view, as all manned space flight technologies can be used for multiple purposes.
But then they're fed up with you Mars Nuts, of whatever flavor, including the imported ones.