• Space/Science
  • GeekSpeak
  • Mysteries of
    the Multiverse
  • Science Fiction
  • The Comestible Zone
  • Off-Topic
  • Community
  • Flame
  • CurrentEvents

Recent posts

Always worth reposting FrankC June 18, 2013 3:52 pm (Flame)

So much for the IRS "scandal" BuckGalaxy June 18, 2013 3:39 pm (CurrentEvents)

What did FDR, HST, JFK, WJC, & BHO do that RMN, RR, GHWB and GWB forbade? bowser June 17, 2013 9:33 pm (Off-Topic)

Jumping internet horses TB June 17, 2013 10:27 am (GeekSpeak)

Australia takes a stand alcaray June 14, 2013 5:17 pm (CurrentEvents)

Hey, kid, you know where I said your gig was going to be playing Mickey at Disney World? TB June 12, 2013 8:57 am (Off-Topic)

Did Google Earth Eat My Hard Drive? podrock June 10, 2013 10:59 pm (podrock)

NLC's podrock June 10, 2013 8:57 pm (podrock)

Home » Space/Science

Asteroid mining December 7, 2012 2:29 pm TB

A sort of continuation of the discussion below, which was creeping off my screen.

A short thought experiment I did some years back.

That’s a lot of money for just one asteroid.

Large quantities of resources are best moved through space on slow orbits, in a train of intermittent launches to create a “pipeline.” Think coal moving on trains across a continent. Mass drivers can launch simple metals and ores from asteroids, and theoretically a “mass catcher” can retrieve them at the other end, although this is tricky. Atmospheric braking of giant masses of metal is not something I’d like to bring up to an insurance company. The more refining and “cooking down” you can do onsite, the less the transportation becomes an issue.

  • Something the earlier thread overlooked: Energy. by podrock 2012-12-07 15:50:24

    Search

    The Control Panel

    • Log in
    • Register